From "NewEnglandPatriot" (nom de plume)
Thank you for your in-depth reporting on 'Certifi-Gate.' Your coverage is thorough and presented from all angles. Your own personal analysis of the current situation is well-researched and therefore factual. After you published your article about the problems you have had from certain minions in Chicago, I posted blogs on various websites urging readers to go to your site. I hope it helps, and I wish you much success in the future. Your website is an excellent source for the daily news.
Response from Robert Jay March.
Thanks very much for your help, and I hope other readers will follow your example.
From "EverPsyPgh" (nom de plume)
Have been receiving your 'March Report ... have followed it fairly regularly, for its info that is seldom available in the liberally-biased MSM, and its apparent attempts at objectivity/reliability. Thus I have found its reports to be worth reading and consideration; which is a compliment in this day and age of liberally-biased pseudo-so-called journalism. Seems it is no longer 'freedom of the press,' but the need for 'freedom from the press,' through publications such as yours. Would appreciate some more open description of your ownership, philosophy, and origins, etc.; which I have, so far, been unable to find in your reports.
Response from Robert Jay March.
The March Report is named after me. After spending more than half a century listening to mispronunciations of my difficult-to-pronounce birth name, I changed it to Robert Jay March, which is an anglicized version of my birth name. In that this is intended to be a news site, I prefer not to talk about myself at all, in that I am not news. When we started, we had no idea that Certifi-Gate was around the corner, and, to the degree that I've discussed myself at all, it was simply to refute false accusations of racism or political bias. As to my philosophy, it is simply this: "Do what's right, no matter what the cost. It always costs. Do what's right anyway." Implicit in that is never lying to anyone about anything, ever.
From Mary, a reader in Virginia:
First of all I would like to thank you for being the press that should be everywhere. Everyday I awake one of the first things I do is go to your site to read the updated news, it is pleasure to see someone that is not afraid to report on Barrack OBama aka Barry like Hannity refuses to do now that the election is over. Continue what you are doing and lets get to the bottom of this Illegal so called Presidet Elect. Our CONSTITUION is in DANGER and we need the word to get out to more people. I commend you for all the truth that you tell. Don't let others bring you down! You all are the best along with www.obamacrimes.com
Response from Robert Jay March.
Thanks very much. The March Report has become, second only to Phil Berg's own obamacrimes.com site, the primary channel for information on the Certifi-Gate scandal. I fancy The March Report as Paul Revere to Phil's George Washington. He leads the effort; I shoot my mouth off.
From Daniel, a March Report Daily Alert Subscriber:
You're such a good journalist and I hope you can write an article, on marchreport.com, how the SOB will qualify to get on the ballot for 2012 election without declaring marshal law. He will be Barry USOB (U surper S oetoro/OB ama), and many knows he is not nbc so the SOS of each state cannot legally put him on the ballot. He will have to dismantle our military first and create his own army, because we have the most powerful military in the world that will go against barry USOB. I am afraid of our withdrawal from Iraq because I think barry USOB will have them march all the way to Afghanistan where they will be so vulnerable to attacks as they are in one group, if you get my meaning.
Response from Robert Jay March.
Given that he already got on the ballot once, and got elected, if the courts do not remove him, only a drastic downturn in his popularity would prevent a second term. I don't mean to rain on your parade, but we're in deep doo-doo here, and the courts seem to be in the tank for him, along with the mainstream media.
From "virginialee" (nom de plume)
I am sure you have heard over and over again that both Justice Roberts and Obama flubbed rather badly on the oath of office. In fact some attorneys say it should be done again, that Obama may not be legally sworn in the way it is. My thought is this: did Justice Roberts intentionally flub on the oath so it would not be legal - because he knows that Obama is not legally qualified to be president? Could he have done this on purpose to stall some time until the Supreme Court deals with it legally through the pending lawsuits? I do hope so. If I am correct, that would be a brilliant move on Justice Roberts' part! Is this possible? P.S.: I appreciate so very much your efforts on behalf of our once great nation! Thank you!
Response from Robert Jay March.
Given that only Justice Scalia had the good sense to excuse himself from Obama's visit to the Supreme Court, and the entire court staff gave Obama an ovation, coupled with the Court's prior rulings, I'm very pessimistic about what the Court will do about his ineligibility. Frankly, it seems as it they're in the tank for him.
A consciousness of guilt by both men could easily explain what happened. So could the desire to insulate oneself against felony charges.
From "NewEnglandPatriot" (nom de plume)
Your cover story entitled 'America in Captivity' is very appropriate. Thank you for doing that, and please continue to do it until the Usurper is out of office. You are not crazy; I have been thinking the same thing about Obama and Biden. There have been too many slips of the tongue for it to be a coincidence. The Democrats knew that Obama was not eligible to run, much less take the office, and they figure if he's removed, they'll have Biden. Biden is older, more experienced, and certainly more qualified than Obama, even though he cannot stop putting his foot in his mouth every time it opens. Obama is just the front man, and he hasn't made these cabinet choices. They were made for him. I find myself wondering, too, what has happened to the Supreme Court, our Constitution, and all the laws on the books. Is this a giant conspiracy even involving the highest court in the land? And this joke of a second swearing-in ceremony is no more legal than the first. They forgot to use a Bible!
Response from Robert Jay March.
Thanks very much for you kind comments; however, there is no Constitutional requirement for the use of a Bible when taking the Oath of Office. The Oath, rendered properly, would be just as valid if done with one's hand on the Koran, The Lotus Sutra, the Bhagavad Gita, or a Zane Grey novel. In order for the Oath to be valid, however, one must have met the eligibility requirements of Article II Section 1, the same Article and Section that contains the mandated oath.
Originally Published on
Sunday, January 18, 2009
In response to his subscription to The March Report Daily Alert, Bill wrote:
"Thanks for this mail. This should make good reading for a long time to come."
Charlie in Oakland, CA wrote:
Thank You, Thank You and Thank You for such a powerful article. The information that You have made available to me is Awesome, Informative and Timely.
I just want You to know that I am forwarding this information to "My Posse" who are a number of Guys that I have been playing tennis with, on Saturdays for 30 years. This group consist of Lawyers, Doctors, Business Owners, College Instructors and Teachers and most importantly faithfull Saturday morning tennis Players.
I know that they will be "Blessed" just as I have been over the past several days with the information that YOU took time out of Your day to send to me.
Have a Great 2009 and beyond
M.T. posted this to our "blogged" ratings page:
Excellent overview of the news. Reports on issues others are afraid to do.
A reader who wishes to be referred to by the nom de plume "browneyedgirl" writes:
Love you Robert March! I look forward each and every day to The March Report. I love your style of writing ... straight forward and professional and love the occasional humor! Quite honestly I do not watch the MSM anymore or go to their websites ... they disgust me to no end! Now if you only had your own news show on TV...one can dream! I have told so many about your website and will continue to do so! God Bless you for all you do especially on Certifi-gate!
March Report response:
Thanks very much, belle femme brune aux yeux! As to The March Report. having our own news show on TV, that's not very likely. Given that Robert is disabled and homebound, it would have to be shot here rather than in a studio. Also, we'd probably cost whatever broadcasting or cable network who picked us up every advertiser they've got, as we are neither liberal, nor conservative, not libertarian, nor any definable category; we don't pay attention to talking points from the DNC or the RNC. Our policy is not to lie to anyone, about anything, ever. Robert's personal motto, as well as that of the entire March Report organization (vast enterprise that it is) is "Do what's right, no matter what the cost. It always costs. Do what's right anyway." Can you imagine a TV show like that? TV networks and large media organizations seems to believe, "Do what's right, unless it costs us money. Then, lie through your teeth."
Helen N posted this to our "blogged" ratings page:
Excellent alternative to the Drudge Report! At least as much info, but much more entertaining, and the presentation is much more professional
A reader who wishes to be referred to by the nom de plume "prophet" writes:
Robert, I've been receiving your report for only a couple of months but I find it very interesting and highly informative with facts, not lies. Thank you for allowing us the privilege of ranting now and then.
March Report response:
You're very welcome, and feel free to write anytime. We actually read all of your e-mails, whether they agree with us or not. We'd also like to hear if there are any ares of coverage you'd like to see that we're not doing now. We're not promising you'll like what we say on a given issue, but we'll cover it if we're are able.
Ursula S. posted this to our "blogged" ratings page:
It is my opinion that tabloids have become more credible as a source of news than high profile and national news agencies of ALL types in our country. These newspapers, news stations, internet, etc. seem to have abandoned any journalistic ethic or human decency in their reporting.They seem to be held accountable for nothing while the tabloids can get sued. The March Report is a refreshing break from the daily onslaught of the simplistic propaganda that seems to imply that Americans are all idiots. It is filled with critical thinking! (Do we remember what that looks like in print?!). Facts are allowed to be followed bipartisanly. That means that a fact has one side. Once a fact is established we do not have to confuse the issue with presenting "both" sides. The March Report is a credible source of news!