This new section is the equivalent of a newspaper's "Letters to the Editor" Section. Here, we will run and respond to e-mails from those who love us and those who hate us (we don't expect to hear much from those who couldn't care less). The names attributed to the comments were the names provided by the sender. You may use a nom de plume, if you wish to remain anonymous.

First, a few of the nice ones ...

From "NewEnglandPatriot" (nom de plume)

Thank you for your in-depth reporting on 'Certifi-Gate.' Your coverage is thorough and presented from all angles. Your own personal analysis of the current situation is well-researched and therefore factual. After you published your article about the problems you have had from certain minions in Chicago, I posted blogs on various websites urging readers to go to your site. I hope it helps, and I wish you much success in the future. Your website is an excellent source for the daily news.

Response from Robert Jay March.

Thanks very much for your help, and I hope other readers will follow your example.

From "EverPsyPgh" (nom de plume)

Have been receiving your 'March Report ... have followed it fairly regularly, for its info that is seldom available in the liberally-biased MSM, and its apparent attempts at objectivity/reliability. Thus I have found its reports to be worth reading and consideration; which is a compliment in this day and age of liberally-biased pseudo-so-called journalism. Seems it is no longer 'freedom of the press,' but the need for 'freedom from the press,' through publications such as yours. Would appreciate some more open description of your ownership, philosophy, and origins, etc.; which I have, so far, been unable to find in your reports.

Response from Robert Jay March.

The March Report is named after me. After spending more than half a century listening to mispronunciations of my difficult-to-pronounce birth name, I changed it to Robert Jay March, which is an anglicized version of my birth name. In that this is intended to be a news site, I prefer not to talk about myself at all, in that I am not news. When we started, we had no idea that Certifi-Gate was around the corner, and, to the degree that I've discussed myself at all, it was simply to refute false accusations of racism or political bias. As to my philosophy, it is simply this: "Do what's right, no matter what the cost. It always costs. Do what's right anyway." Implicit in that is never lying to anyone about anything, ever.

From Mary, a reader in Virginia:

First of all I would like to thank you for being the press that should be everywhere. Everyday I awake one of the first things I do is go to your site to read the updated news, it is pleasure to see someone that is not afraid to report on Barrack OBama aka Barry like Hannity refuses to do now that the election is over. Continue what you are doing and lets get to the bottom of this Illegal so called Presidet Elect. Our CONSTITUION is in DANGER and we need the word to get out to more people. I commend you for all the truth that you tell. Don't let others bring you down! You all are the best along with www.obamacrimes.com

Response from Robert Jay March.

Thanks very much. The March Report has become, second only to Phil Berg's own obamacrimes.com site, the primary channel for information on the Certifi-Gate scandal. I fancy The March Report as Paul Revere to Phil's George Washington. He leads the effort; I shoot my mouth off.

From Daniel, a March Report Daily Alert Subscriber:

You're such a good journalist and I hope you can write an article, on marchreport.com, how the SOB will qualify to get on the ballot for 2012 election without declaring marshal law. He will be Barry USOB (U surper S oetoro/OB ama), and many knows he is not nbc so the SOS of each state cannot legally put him on the ballot. He will have to dismantle our military first and create his own army, because we have the most powerful military in the world that will go against barry USOB. I am afraid of our withdrawal from Iraq because I think barry USOB will have them march all the way to Afghanistan where they will be so vulnerable to attacks as they are in one group, if you get my meaning.

Response from Robert Jay March.

Given that he already got on the ballot once, and got elected, if the courts do not remove him, only a drastic downturn in his popularity would prevent a second term. I don't mean to rain on your parade, but we're in deep doo-doo here, and the courts seem to be in the tank for him, along with the mainstream media.

From "virginialee" (nom de plume)

I am sure you have heard over and over again that both Justice Roberts and Obama flubbed rather badly on the oath of office. In fact some attorneys say it should be done again, that Obama may not be legally sworn in the way it is. My thought is this: did Justice Roberts intentionally flub on the oath so it would not be legal - because he knows that Obama is not legally qualified to be president? Could he have done this on purpose to stall some time until the Supreme Court deals with it legally through the pending lawsuits? I do hope so. If I am correct, that would be a brilliant move on Justice Roberts' part! Is this possible? P.S.: I appreciate so very much your efforts on behalf of our once great nation! Thank you!

Response from Robert Jay March.

Given that only Justice Scalia had the good sense to excuse himself from Obama's visit to the Supreme Court, and the entire court staff gave Obama an ovation, coupled with the Court's prior rulings, I'm very pessimistic about what the Court will do about his ineligibility. Frankly, it seems as it they're in the tank for him.
     A consciousness of guilt by both men could easily explain what happened. So could the desire to insulate oneself against felony charges.

From "NewEnglandPatriot" (nom de plume)

Your cover story entitled 'America in Captivity' is very appropriate. Thank you for doing that, and please continue to do it until the Usurper is out of office. You are not crazy; I have been thinking the same thing about Obama and Biden. There have been too many slips of the tongue for it to be a coincidence. The Democrats knew that Obama was not eligible to run, much less take the office, and they figure if he's removed, they'll have Biden. Biden is older, more experienced, and certainly more qualified than Obama, even though he cannot stop putting his foot in his mouth every time it opens. Obama is just the front man, and he hasn't made these cabinet choices. They were made for him. I find myself wondering, too, what has happened to the Supreme Court, our Constitution, and all the laws on the books. Is this a giant conspiracy even involving the highest court in the land? And this joke of a second swearing-in ceremony is no more legal than the first. They forgot to use a Bible!

Response from Robert Jay March.

Thanks very much for you kind comments; however, there is no Constitutional requirement for the use of a Bible when taking the Oath of Office. The Oath, rendered properly, would be just as valid if done with one's hand on the Koran, The Lotus Sutra, the Bhagavad Gita, or a Zane Grey novel. In order for the Oath to be valid, however, one must have met the eligibility requirements of Article II Section 1, the same Article and Section that contains the mandated oath.

Not everyone loves us, though. "mollybrowne2000" (nom de plume)

Cut the crap, get down on your knees and thank God again and again for Obama, and we need to thank him over and over to see the the back of dumb ass Bush. I am white European and an American and I speak for the whole of the continent of Europe and most of the USA. The excitement is palpable throughout the world.

Response from Robert Jay March.

At most, you speak for 52% of the country, ACORN, and perhaps George Soros. I say "at most" because a recent AOL poll determined that more than 50% of the country believes that the Certifi-Gate issue is worthy of investigation. As for "dumb ass Bush," he kept our country safe and free, so that idiots like you can continue being idiots without wearing a burka, and that so a child raised in the Muslim faith, who grew up to be a Christian adult, would not be forced to pay the penalty the Taliban imposes on any that they consider apostate.
     I wish no harm to Mr. Obama. I could even support his right to run for the Presidency again, but only after the passage and ratification of a Constitutional Amendment that nullifies Article II Section 1 of the Constitution. At present, regardless of how wonderful anyone thinks he is, he holds the office illegally.

Some people submitted comments on issues, without specific reference to The March Report

From "beachpoet" (nom de plume)

I'm sure most folks have seen this, but for those who haven't I just want to share how the rest of the world is laughing: An editorial from the London Daily Mail on Obama's Victory Tue, 01/06/2009 - 2:13pm Obama's Victory A victory for the hysterical Oprah Winfrey, the mad racist preacher Jeremiah Wright, the mainstream media who abandoned any sense of objectivity long ago, Europeans who despise America largely because they depend on her, comics who claim to be dangerous and fearless but would not dare attack genuinely powerful special interest groups. A victory for Obama-worshippers everywhere. A victory for the cult of the cult. A man who has done little with his life but has written about his achievements as if he had found the cure for cancer in between winning a marathon and building a nuclear reactor with his teeth. Victory for style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-raising over reality. A victory for Hollywood, the most dysfunctional community in the world.

From "ozdon" (nom de plume)

If there was a requirement of proof, a master forger would produce the "official" birth certificate. Any other result would be riots throughout the country and possibly problems in the military.

From "doccharley" (nom de plume)

My answers to current economic problems consists of two phases: 1: Shut down the government printing presses for at least six months. 2: Return to the gold standard. Our money has no meaningful backing. For the government to continue essentially worthless bills will lead to worse financial collapse and possibly bankrupcy. Many countries that depend upon the dollar will follow our financial collapse.

From an anonymous reader:

This does indeed have merit. Let's pass this around the United States and start immediately! When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen are they reduce their staff and workers. The remaining workers need to find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well.. Wall street, and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of 'tough decision', and his board of directors gives him a big bonus. I feel our government should not be immune from similar risks. I therefore am recommending the following cuts to be implemented by the next president elect. Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members and Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Also reduce remaining staff by 25%. Accomplish this over the next 8 years. (two steps / two elections) and of course this would require some redistricting.

Response from Robert Jay March.

What you propose would require a Constitutional Amendment; it cannot legally be done by fiat; at least, assuming the Constitution still matters.